Roofing questions: Plainfield, IN
Is ice & water shield required in Plainfield, IN?
No. NOT REQUIRED BY THE TABLE IN HENDRICKS COUNTY - BUT THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS CAN STILL REQUIRE IT, AND THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ANSWER. Indiana deletes the model climatic table and substitutes its own: 675 IAC 14-4.4-5 directs "Delete TABLE R301.2(1) and the corresponding footnotes and substitute to read as follows", and the substituted table runs one row per county. Row 32 is Hendricks, and it carries "No" in the column headed "Ice Shield Underlayment Required". Twenty-seven of Indiana's ninety-two counties carry "Yes" there and they are the northern tier; Hendricks is one of the other sixty-five. The rest of the Hendricks row reads wind speed 115 mph, seismic design category B, ground snow 20 psf, foundation depth 30 inches, winter design temperature 2 degrees F and weathering Severe. WHAT "NO" ACTUALLY MEANS HERE, IN THE STATE BUILDING COMMISSIONER'S OWN WORDS. The requirement in Section R905.1.2 is triggered "as designated in Table R301.2(1)", and the Commissioner's Ice/Water Shield and Metal Drip Edge guidance of February 25, 2020 explains that the sections requiring installation in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions still apply on top of the table: "Together, these sections and Table R301.2(1) set forth the locations and circumstances in which ice/water shield are required. In short, there are specific counties in which it is always required (per Table R301.2(1)), and specific counties in which it is required only when the roofing manufacturer's written installation instructions require it (per Sections R903.1, R904.1 and R905.1)." Hendricks County is in the second group. So in Plainfield the ice barrier is not required by the table, and it IS required wherever the shingle you are installing calls for it in its own written installation instructions. Read the wrapper, not the map - and note that a manufacturer's warranty is a separate matter the Commissioner expressly declines to enforce.
Is drip edge required in Plainfield, IN?
Yes. STATE-GOVERNED AND UNCONDITIONAL ON A SHINGLE ROOF. Plainfield cannot vary it - IC 22-13-2-3(c) provides that "A city, town, or county may not adopt an ordinance that conflicts with or includes more stringent or detailed requirements than the commission's rules" - and the Town's own codes page says it adopted the Articles of Title 675 rather than writing roofing rules of its own. The operative text is published first-hand by the Indiana State Building Commissioner, on Indiana Department of Homeland Security letterhead, in the Ice/Water Shield and Metal Drip Edge guidance of February 25, 2020, which reproduces the adopted Section R905.2.8.5 in full: "A drip edge shall be provided at eaves and rake edges of shingle roofs. Adjacent segments of drip edge shall be overlapped not less than 2 inches (51 mm). Drip edges shall extend not less than ¼ inch (6.4 mm) below the roof sheathing and extend up back onto the roof deck not less than 2 inches (51 mm). Drip edges shall be mechanically fastened to the rood deck at not more than 12 inches (305 mm) o.c. with fasteners as specified in Section R905.2.5 Underlayment shall be installed over the drip edge along eaves and under the drip edge along rake edges." The word "rood" in that passage is a typographical error in the published guidance and is quoted here as printed; it plainly means the roof deck. The Indiana rule amends the flashing section only by deleting the word "approved" and does not touch the drip edge subsection, so this text governs as published. Note that the drip edge requirement is NOT conditioned on the county the way the ice barrier is - it applies on every shingle roof in Indiana, including the sixty-five counties whose climatic row reads "No" for the ice shield, and Hendricks is one of those.
Can you roof over an existing roof in Plainfield, IN?
NO LOCAL LAYER RULE IS POSSIBLE IN PLAINFIELD. The Town states that it "adopted the Articles of Title 675 of the Indiana Administrative Code", and the residential rule in that title is 675 IAC 14-4.4, the 2020 Indiana Residential Code, which incorporates the 2018 International Residential Code. That rule runs to 245 numbered sections and its only amendments touching the model roofing chapter are the deletion of the last sentence of the rooftop photovoltaic section and deletions of the words "approved" and "printed" from the asphalt shingle attachment and flashing sections. It makes no amendment at all to the model code's reroofing and roof-recover section, which does not appear anywhere in the Indiana rule. So the base International Residential Code rule on recovering an existing roof applies here exactly as published. Base-code rule, read at 2018 International Residential Code Section R908.3.1.1, Roof recover not allowed, and quoted here rather than left behind the ICC paywall: a roof recover "shall not be permitted" where "the existing roof has two or more applications of any type of roof covering." One existing layer may be recovered; a second existing layer means a tear-off to the deck. Plainfield could not change it: IC 22-13-2-3(c) bars a city, town or county from an ordinance that conflicts with or includes more stringent or detailed requirements than the state rules, and IC 22-13-2-3(a)(2) gives the state rules precedence over any local ordinance covering the same subject matter. The number of layers a particular roof may carry therefore comes out of the adopted International Residential Code itself, and a roofer planning a recover rather than a tear-off should settle the existing layer count with the Building Department against that code before quoting.
What building code does Plainfield, IN use?
STATE-SET, AND PLAINFIELD SAYS SO ITSELF. The Town's Ordinances, Standards and Codes page states under its Building heading: "The Town of Plainfield adopted the Articles of Title 675 of the Indiana Administrative Code. For the current codes refer to the Indiana Association of Building Officials website, and for the State of Indiana amendments, visit the Indiana website." Title 675 is the Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission's title, and a house re-roof falls under its Article 14. THAT ADOPTION FLOATS RATHER THAN FREEZING. IC 22-13-2-3(b) provides that a reference to the rules "by citation to the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), shall be construed to include all amendments as of the date that the reference is written and any later amendments to that provision, unless accompanied by a reference to a specific edition or supplement to the Indiana Administrative Code." Plainfield names no edition, so it tracks the current rule. WHAT ARTICLE 14 IS TODAY. The rule in force is 675 IAC 14-4.4, whose opening section provides that "That certain document being titled the 2018 International Residential Code for One and Two Family Dwellings, first printing August 2017, published by the International Code Council ... is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set out in this rule save and except those revisions made in this rule", and that "This rule shall be known as the 2020 Indiana Residential Code." It was filed November 26, 2019 and formally readopted November 18, 2025, and it is the newest rule in its article. No Indiana town could be on a different residential code in any event: IC 22-13-2-3(c) provides that "A city, town, or county may not adopt an ordinance that conflicts with or includes more stringent or detailed requirements than the commission's rules", and IC 22-13-2-3(a)(2) gives those rules precedence over any local ordinance covering the same subject matter. WHAT INDIANA CHANGES IN THE ROOFING CHAPTER, read section by section: 675 IAC 14-4.4 makes exactly four amendments to the model code's roofing chapter. Section 84 deletes the text of the last sentence of the rooftop photovoltaic panel section without substitution - a whole sentence, not a word. Sections 85 and 86 delete the word "approved" from the asphalt shingle attachment section and from the flashing section. Section 87 deletes the word "printed" from the other-flashing section. Indiana makes no amendment at all to the model reroofing and roof-recover section. THE TOWN'S OWN ADOPTING SECTION HAS NOW BEEN READ. Section 150.005 of the Plainfield Code of Ordinances (Ord. 02-2010, passed March 8, 2010) incorporates, "Pursuant to I.C. 22-13-2-3(b)", the Commission's rules in Articles 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24 and 25 of Title 675 - Article 14 by name as the "Indiana Residential Code" - and "shall include any later amendments to those Articles", so the Town's adoption floats with the state rule rather than fixing an edition, and the section contains no roofing provision of its own.
Is a mid-roof inspection required in Plainfield, IN?
No. NO MID-ROOF OR ROOF-STAGE INSPECTION IS PRESCRIBED. The Town publishes its Residential Building Inspection Procedures as a single sheet and it names every inspection it requires: a combined Footing/Foundation/Under-Slab inspection before backfilling and before covering any mechanical, electrical or plumbing; a Rough-in inspection with all mechanical, electrical, plumbing, framing, anchoring and draft stopping installed and exposed; an Energy Efficiency inspection with all insulation installed and windows and doors caulked and foamed; and an Occupancy inspection. The sheet was read in full and none of the four is a roofing, roof-deck or mid-roof inspection. ONE ROOF-ADJACENT CONDITION IS BURIED IN THE ROUGH-IN ENTRY AND IS WORTH KNOWING: "Homes must have a weather resistant covering on the exterior prior to inspection." On new construction that puts the exterior envelope ahead of the rough-in inspection rather than after it. WHAT ELSE THE SHEET REQUIRES, BECAUSE IT IS EXPENSIVE TO GET WRONG. All inspection requests go through the Town's iWorQ portal, searched by building permit number with a contractor access code that is "Typically, main contractor phone number minus area code and dashes", and "All requests shall be made two (2) business days in advance of the date of the inspection." The permit must be on display: "The Building Permit shall be clearly displayed at the site during construction ... When a permit is not posted on the site, the requested inspection will not be conducted, a $25 per day fee for each day not displayed and a re-inspection fee will be assessed. A re-inspection request must be submitted." The only exception to posting is the footing, foundation and under-slab inspection, where the inspector places a green tag instead. Residential re-inspections run $150 for the first, $300 for the second and $600 for each one after that, and working without an inspection carries a residential minimum fine of $300.